Licence and Legal FAQ/OSMF Vote: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Initial page |
Add intro page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==OSMF Statement== |
|||
{{stub}} |
|||
In December 2009, OpenStreetMap Foundation members were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with a [http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf proposal] to change the OpenStreetMap geodata license. ''The vote is now over. 55% of eligible members have voted, and 89% of those who voted have voted yes. So almost 49% of all eligible members have expressed their agreement to ODbL, and 6% have expressed their disagreement. [http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2009-December/000751.html Detailed results]. '' |
|||
The community created 2 pages, which have been archived here: |
|||
* [[License/OSMF_Vote/Why You Should Vote Yes|Why You Should Vote Yes]] |
|||
* [[License/OSMF_Vote/Why You Should Vote No|Why You Should Vote No]] |
|||
===Also see=== |
|||
* [[OSM:Open Data License/Why You Should Relicense|Why You Should Relicense]] |
|||
* [[OSM:Open Data License/Why You Should Decline|Why You Should Decline]] |
|||
Revision as of 20:31, 7 December 2010
OSMF Statement
In December 2009, OpenStreetMap Foundation members were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with a proposal to change the OpenStreetMap geodata license. The vote is now over. 55% of eligible members have voted, and 89% of those who voted have voted yes. So almost 49% of all eligible members have expressed their agreement to ODbL, and 6% have expressed their disagreement. Detailed results.
The community created 2 pages, which have been archived here: