Difference between revisions of "License"

m (Acceptance and Implementation Process)
m (Acceptance and Implementation Process)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Approved the process:
 
| Approved the process:
| 132
+
|style="text-align:right" | 132
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Did not approve the process:
 
| Did not approve the process:
| 16
+
|style="text-align:right" | 16
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Didn't vote:
 
| Didn't vote:
| 122
+
|style="text-align:right" | 122
 
|}
 
|}
   

Revision as of 13:31, 3 January 2010

The OpenStreetMap License

The OpenStreetMap project is proposing to move to a new license, known as the Open Database License (ODbL) which would replace the existing CCBYSA license due to problems with the CCBYSA license when applied to data. The license is intended to clarify the terms under which people make contributions to the project and the terms under which people can use the data. It is a basically a share alike license for data.

The Foundation supports the adoption of this license and has reviewed it with their lawyers and it is now being discussed by the community. The proposed license has been developed by OpenDataCommons a project of the Open Knowledge Foundation.

The Foundation's License Working Group presented a proposal document to the members. A summary was also presented at the State Of The Map 2009 conference. This process is documented here. We also welcome any review and comment by other bodies working in the open intellectual properties rights arena, and have published an open letter asking for their views.

The proposed license comes in two parts. One, the Open Database License (ODbL) covers the database itself and, and a set of upgraded Contributor Terms covers the content of the database.

The license remains firmly rooted in the attribution, share-alike provisions of the existing Creative Commons License but the ODbL is far more suitable for open factual databases rather than the creative works of art. It extends far greater potential protection and is far clearer when, why and where the share-alike provisions are triggered. There are further reasons for moving away from CC BY-SA here.

Acceptance and Implementation Process

We have a proposed adoption plan. This is not cast in stone and we welcome direct comments on the discussion page for the plan.

OSMF members have voted on whether they wish to put the current version of the new license to the community for adoption and then begin the adoption process itself. The results from 270 members polled are:

Approved the process: 132
Did not approve the process: 16
Didn't vote: 122

alternatively,

Approval rate: 89%
Turnout rate: 55%

Personal statements from community members making the case for and against the change are available on the OSM wiki.

More information

More information including use cases and open issues is available on the OSM wiki.